Cybercops for cybercrime

In an effort to regulate the investigation of digital crimes in the US, some states are considering limiting the practice to private investigators. North and South Carolina, Georgia, New York, Nevada, Texas, Virginia, and Washington are just a few of the states that are enacting compulsory licenses for all forensic investigators.

One of the main issues around digital crime investigation is the issue of jurisdiction. Digital crime has no borders. Someone in New York can carry out criminal activity in Los Angeles without leaving their desk. Under the new laws, anyone investigating this crime would have to be licensed in both New York and Los Angeles for their findings to be admissible in a court of law. If supporting digital evidence were found in other states, the investigator would also need valid IP licenses for them. Evidence from unlicensed investigators will be barred from court and could result in criminal prosecution of offenders.

IT professionals generally have no problem with attempts to regulate their field. Their main concern is that they are being forced into an existing category that does not fit rather than being assigned their own. They fear that by allowing anyone with an IP license to claim the credibility of the forensic investigation, the evidence will be unnecessarily compromised and the image of the field irreparably tarnished. Their argument is that if they must be licensed, regular IPs must also be licensed to carry out the delicate and specialized work of data collection and recovery.

In fact, what is needed is more education everywhere. Forensic investigators should learn more about court procedures and what constitutes admissible evidence, for example, maintaining the chain of custody of evidence and properly documenting findings. Prosecutors need to know more about what is and what is not possible so that they will recognize outlandish claims and know when to question the credibility of the evidence.

If IPs want to participate in digital research, they should be able to demonstrate their competence in the field. There must be a standard exam that all aspiring digital investigators must pass in order to qualify for a PI forensic investigator license. Standardized practices will make it easier for researchers to work across state lines. Standardization will also contribute to transparency in a field whose specialized nature puts you at risk of confusion.

Regulations are necessary in all industries. They help those within the industries to work to the best of their ability and create a sense of responsibility and responsibility. It is undeniable that the field of digital research needs to be regulated, since without it the evidence is open to compromise. But legislators must be careful that regulations serve the industries they are designed to protect and not detract from credibility. Stan King of the Verizon Business Services Forensic and Investigative Response Practice said, “As a physician who attended medical school, works in his field, receives continuing education, and maintains his medical licenses, that’s the level of responsibility. we need for digital forensic science. ” “I don’t think the South Carolina courts will argue.

Recommended site:

http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Projects-Security/Computer-Forensics-Faces-Private-Eye-Competition/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *