The candidacy for Palestinian statehood portrays the image of a battered Palestine seeking justice for the world. Here are the facts to keep in mind. Palestine has consistently refused to build its state in the past; they rejected the 1937 offer by the British government, then ruling Palestine, to divide the land into Jewish and Arab states. Arab leaders refused again in 1947, choosing to go to war rather than accept the UN decision to divide Palestine between the Jewish and Arab populations. In 1967, Israel offered to give up the land it had acquired in exchange for peace with its neighbors. The Arab world issued a response at a summit in Khartoum, “No peace with Israel, no negotiations with Israel, no recognition of Israel.” In 2000, under the proposal of the Middle East Quartet, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians a sovereign state with shared control of Jerusalem and billions of dollars in compensation for Palestinian refugees. Yasser Arafat rejected the offer and returned to launch the deadly war of terror known as the Second Intifada.
After all the persistent refusals, Abbas painfully pleaded with the world to end the so-called historical injustice with a demand for the full membership of the state of Palestine in the UN and declared the legitimate right of Palestine to achieve its freedom and independence.
Consider the following points: Statehood and settlements are not a problem for Palestinian leaders. Had it been, the Palestinian leadership would have accepted the offer of statehood and built a state. If Abbas had really wanted a state of Palestine to live in peace alongside Israel, he could have made his commitment in New York to end the conflict and offered guarantees to take action to stop the hatred and killings of the Jewish people. This would have secured the first step in building peace and marrying for a bilateral agreement rather than rushing to the UN.
The rejection of the statehood offer clearly indicates that Palestine is not seeking peace. The existence of Israel is the problem that is believed to be solved by internationalizing the conflict with Israel. The goal of Palestine is to achieve a single nation by removing Israel from the map of the Middle East. The Palestinian leadership found a viable route through a UN offer and by gaining UN membership to use the platform and network to challenge Israel’s current possessions and minimize its territories; while at the same time planning an integrated action to annihilate Israel through the Arab network. Iran’s nuclear program is part of Israel’s annihilation plan. The poster / website and Facebook campaigns are implemented to generate worldwide sympathy under the lies.
The horrendous comments conferred on the Jews are enough to provoke World War III. Israel is blatantly called imperialist and colonialist in the conflict in its homeland. Israel and Palestine do not have a relationship of ruler and ruled or oppressor and oppressed to disdainfully describe Israel as a fascist. Jews around the world represent diverse racial ethnicities in different shades that cannot justify the apartheid and racist abuses launched against Israel. The mind-blowing accusation like the child killer in internet poster campaigns and the face book without evidence spits in their faces. They are ridiculed as people of mythical origin ‘Chosen by God’. The Chinese are the center of the universe, Muslims receive a heavenly reward for the demolition of non-Muslims on earth, the Hindu caste system ordered an eternal state to one man through all generations, and the racial superiority of men whites lynched the world. These absurdities of humanity are not mocked as they deeply wound the world for the Jewish notion of being ‘Chosen of God’ and for being deeply attached to their ancient homeland.
Jews are treated as criminals and sinners in their own defense and accused of trespassers in their settlement in their own land against the Arab settlers who came as vagrants from Egypt and Jordon to that empty land after the Jewish diaspora after the Roman invasion. . The Arabs did not create any state in that ancient Jewish homeland within this time frame. Returning to their homeland under a special humanitarian package of global sympathy is questioned by perverts after 65 years of statehood and some obnoxious scholars even dared to question the origin of a 5000-year-old culture to ridicule its history as mere myths that they discredit the value. of ancient writings as literary sources for the construction of history and snobbishly despising archaeological monuments and the remains of their ancestry. Life is about meeting needs and also empathizing with suffering and is called an inclusive approach in managing public affairs today. The dozens of unfriendly Arab nations in oil-rich lands do not believe in such a principled approach of being inclusive and humane to making life worth living and instead are wasted online for a plan to overthrow Israel forever.
In this notorious elimination game mission, the world’s pseudo-intellectuals and perverts further helped construct vague theories to question Israel’s history, culture, and heritage in order to oppose Zionism, which their dull eyes see as the cause of the problem when this occurs. an effect of the problem of insecurity in Israel, which will disappear when the cause of the problem is eliminated. By attacking the symptoms, you are fueling more radical actions that have fueled more hatred of Jews and you are not helping to solve the problem. Propaganda against Israel as a terrorist state in its self-defense is a mean description that does not justify the practical situation of life. If one’s very existence is threatened, would someone sit quietly? No. He agreed that Israel responded vehemently to these challenges that led humanitarian calls and supporters to question Palestinian civil liberties and rights without acknowledging the same facts in all terror situations. The dilemma of fighting terrorism and becoming a terror to the innocent is not exclusive to a single case; it has become a global problem. Palestine’s violation of Israel’s civil rights and freedoms is justified, but the opposite is not justified.
The popular poster posted on websites and Facebook showing a child holding the “Do not kill Palestinian children” banner in a poster campaign blatantly alleged Israel as a child killer without evidence. It is not to justify the massacre, but to see the massacre in the perspective of conflict situations around the world, it is necessary to refer to global cases to validate the act of self-defense in the face of a threat. Israel – The situation in Palestine is not like the massacre of innocent civilians by the Middle East dictatorship. The anti-Jewish campaigns blamed the Zionists for a radical turn of events without understanding the chain between radical action leading to radical action and overlooking the role of the PLA in initiating terrorism after repeated rejection of the offer of Palestinian statehood.
In this conflict of half a century. where Jews and Palestinians have been openly at war and declared enemies, does anyone think that assassinations will not occur in such a conflictual situation? In all conflict situations, killing is the strategy and killing will follow. To stop the slaughter, reconciliation is proposed. The process has not been successful in Israel-Palestine because the Palestinian leadership is not interested in a two-nation theory and does not want peace. The Palestinian leadership wants a single state for Palestine by eliminating the Jews.
The penetrating eye should be able to see the candidacy for Palestinian statehood at the UN and the pursuit of UN membership today as a strategy to achieve the goal of a single Arab state through a methodology of annihilation of Israel and acquisition. territorial. Prejudicial campaigns alleged Israel as a terrorist and murderer while endorsing real terrorism and relentlessly supporting its global marketing publicity spree to win worldwide sympathy for an aid to achieve his birthright; yes, a freedom for an ideology to operate uninhibited to remove Israel from the map of the world and remove useless supporters in due course.
Do you hope for peace? Then let us join together to urge a bilateral framework based on mutual respect, cooperation and coexistence for Israel and Palestine with Abbas’ special commitment to declare recognition of the state of Israel alongside that of Palestine.