What is charisma?
Charisma is a magnificent property to mesmerize and others. According to the prevailing wisdom in society, charisma is a divine gift that some people possess, for which they will not be classified as ordinary people, but will be treated as superhumans or as extraordinary men. Charismatic leadership is heterogeneous, it can be political, business, religious. Charisma belongs to a person’s personality. In simple charisma is personal magnetism. Charisma is the reason why people admire some leaders, such as Americans who follow Mr. Richard M. Nixon, even after his involvement in the Watergate scandal. Charisma does not always show a positive impact; it has its own negative aspects. India’s largest corporate fraud was led by Mr. Ramalinga Raju, one of the most effective and charismatic leaders who led the Satyam group of companies to become one of the leading IT solutions companies in India.
Is charisma inherent or acquired?
Contrary to the prevailing wisdom that prevails in society, charisma can be acquired by any individual. Charisma is often considered a trait. Trait is the internal character of a human being like knowledge, energy, etc. Traits like knowledge are not innate, they are acquired, but charisma is an exceptional trait. Charisma is innate in each one but in different amounts. Some leaders like JFK, Bill Clinton are born with miraculous charisma and are considered gifted. Parameters for charisma are communication skills, risk taking, authenticity, etc. All of these characters can be developed by one person, which in turn enhances the charisma of a person. According to the attribution theory, charisma depends on people’s perception. A person is charismatic if and only if people feel that he is charismatic. Steve Jobs was conflicting for some people, but for some he is charismatic, he shows that the charisma of an individual will depend on the environment in which he finds himself. If people needed character and the leader has that character, then he is considered charismatic. There are many cases in which a person who was rejected by the people at some later point proved to be charismatic, as was the case with Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Regan. Some individuals will emerge as charismatic leaders after great speeches like “I have a dream…” by Martin Lutur King. So charisma can be acquired by an individual. Muthandar al Zeidi, the journalist who threw a shoe at the US head of state turned charismatic in Iraq. He happened overnight, but the burning thoughts of him are never forgotten at night. Years of Iraqi bloodshed made him take the initiative and made everyone follow him, admire him. him
Is charisma required to be an effective leader?
Charisma is not required to be an effective leader. Creativity, innovation, anything can propel a leader toward effectiveness. If you can innovate something like Facebook, Microsoft, or Google, you’ll emerge as an effective leader regardless of your charisma levels.
Larry Page and Sergey Brin of Stanford University had significantly low charisma, but they effectively led hundreds of employees and made Google a multibillion-dollar business. This example justifies that charisma is not required to be an effective leader. Charisma is just an extra boost for a normal leader to become extraordinary. Even without charisma, a leader can make you an effective leader if he has other leadership qualities at an extraordinary level, as in the case of Jerry, the former CEO of Yahoo. Mr. Yang Jerry has a great vision, but he still has no charisma, he has worked his way to success.
The space for charisma depends on the field: in religion and politics, charisma has a role to play, not in business. If you can show that your ideas are compelling, you can be an effective leader.
Transformational and charismatic leadership-
Yes, both charismatic leadership and transformational leadership have similarities, as the transformational leader may well be charismatic. Charismatic leadership is part of transformational leadership because in order for a leader to inspire his subordinates to work beyond his own interests, he must have charisma. The ultimate goal of both leaderships is to inspire employees more than they can do. For the most part, both concepts of leadership are the same, but the charismatic leader, who is a personal vision, inspires the employees, while the transformational leaders make the employees aware of their goals and inspire them. Transformational leaders have a basic focus on transforming the organization and, quite possibly, their followers, the charismatic leader, do not want to change anything. Transformational leaders are mostly charismatic like Abraham Lincoln. If you have good intentions towards others, you can do higher and transform an entire company. The charismatic leader gathers followers by force of character and magnetism, rather than any form of external power or influence.
Transformational leaders encourage their subordinates to work for the good of the organization rather than for their own personal gain. Charismatic leadership is also about creating a one-of-a-kind group identity that is very separate from the other group. Leaders make a separate image of the group in the minds of supporters, so supporters can simply recognize themselves with the group, which in turn gives supporters a sense of belonging. The charismatic leader has fantastic self-confidence; they always lead by example, are patient and show great willpower. Transformational leaders raise subordinates’ awareness of the importance of their day-to-day jobs and the importance of doing them well. Transformational leaders create subordinates aware of their requirements for individual expansion, development, and achievement. They have a mental image of how well things could be in an administration that contrasts with how things are currently. Charismatic leaders certainly communicate this vision to their followers and, through their own passion and encouragement, induce their followers to passionately support their vision. Charismatic leaders tend to contain a high degree of self-confidence and self-esteem, which further encourages followers to respect and admire them. The initial attempt of charismatic leaders is to understand the background in which they are doing their work. They attach great importance to the moods and feelings of people and try to connect with them personally.
All transformational leaders are charismatic, but not all charismatic leaders are transformational, for example, Sam Walton and Abraham Lincoln are both transformational and charismatic leaders. Jim Jones, who is famous for his charisma, but never transformational, so do it.
Jose Bizo Tito.
Why flexibility?
In our rapidly changing world, technology advances faster than we can keep up with as virtually every business goes global, and especially as climate change threatens our people. In the especially near future, organizations will be looking for managers who have the skills of sustainable management. It is mandatory for an effective leader to be flexible. The way in which the change in trend suggests us to have a
flexible manager to his nature of work and characteristics corresponding to that work.
Flexible and effective leadership-
The general qualities of the excellent leader are their ability to flex, modify and adapt their style according to the situation, context and circumstances that they experience. Effective leaders make their own decisions and will be able to act differently, think differently, and look to different sources for inspiration. These are all good qualities of flexible leadership, and a flexible leader must make his own decisions without the help of others, adjustable to any situation. The leader’s motivation is to prepare to respond to a large distribution of positions, jobs Every time the leader is curious about which leadership style is the best and wants to show his good qualities and wants to become the role model for others. He clearly and effectively delegates to team members. Leaders at all levels require developing the ability to discover exactly which challenge to focus on at any given moment and how best to respond to it. Even for the same leadership, manners and formal programs will change as conditions change. Common sense alone should ensure that bringing in one position may be less effective in a different position, or when conditions change for reason, leaders at all stages motivate to build the power to figure out what challenge to face at any given time. given. and the best way to react to the same leadership challenge, the rough mix of leadership activity and formal plans will alter as the conditioned reaction changes.
Situational leadership is often taken to mean flexible, where a manager needs to work through different kinds of situations where he or she cannot predict the outcome. The need for such people has increased tremendously in the recent past, as the globalized economy needs people who have those skills set to adapt to all sorts of roles. An effective leader is one who understands the group, the goal to be achieved and the way to achieve it. In general, an effective manager is task oriented, but sometimes the way he manages teams makes them flexible to work in the type of work environment.
According to contingency theory, no management principle is valid for all situations. The effective leader will have many leadership styles and use them according to the situation.